Effect of supplemental acid-etching on the early stages of osseointegration: A preclinical model.

Benalcázar Jalkh, Ernesto B; Parra, Marcelo; Torroni, Andrea; Nayak, Vasudev Vivekanand; Tovar, Nick; Castellano, Arthur; Badalov, Rafael M; Bonfante, Estevam A et al. · J Mech Behav Biomed Mater · 2021

basic_science · Level V

Where this comes from

Abstract

To evaluate the effect of two surface modifications on early osseointegration parameters of conical implants in a translational pre-clinical model. Conical implants with progressive trapezoidal threads and healing chambers were evaluated consisting of two different surface conditions: 1) Implacil surface (IMP Sur), and 2) Implacil surface + Supplemental Acid-etching (IMP Sur + AE). Surface characterization comprised of the evaluation of roughness parameters (S<sub>a</sub>, S<sub>q</sub> and S<sub>dr</sub>), surface energy and contact angle. Subsequently, implants were installed in the ilium crest of nine female sheep (weighing ~65 kg). Torque out, histological and histomorphometric analyses were conducted after 3 and 6 weeks in-vivo. The percentage of bone to implant contact (%BIC) and bone area fraction occupancy within implant threads (%BAFO) were quantified, and the results were analyzed using a general linear mixed model analysis as function of surface treatment and time in-vivo. Supplemental acid etching significantly increased S<sub>a</sub> and S<sub>q</sub> roughness parameters without compromising the surface energy or contact angle, and no significant differences with respect to S<sub>dr</sub>. Torque-out testing yielded significantly higher values for IMP Sur + AE in comparison to the IMP Sur at 3- (62.78 ± 15 and 33.49 ± 15 N.cm, respectively) and 6-weeks (60.74 ± 15 and 39.80 ± 15 N.cm, respectively). Histological analyses depicted similar osseointegration features for both surfaces, where an intramembranous-type healing pattern was observed. At histomorphometric analyses, IMP Sur + AE implants yielded higher values of BIC in comparison to IMP Sur at 3- (40.48 ± 38 and 27.98 ± 38%, respectively) and 6-weeks (45.86 ± 38 and 34.46 ± 38%, respectively). Both groups exhibited a significant increase in %BAFO from 3 (~35%) to 6 weeks (~44%), with no significant differences between surface treatments. Supplemental acid-etching and its interplay with implant thread design, positively influenced the BIC and torque-out resistance at early stages of osseointegration.

Medical subject headings