Editorial Commentary: Remplissage Is Not Needed When Performing the Latarjet Procedure in the Setting of Off-Track Hill-Sachs Lesions: One of the Classics Continues to Get Better With Age (and Some Help From New Data).
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34353556.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.05.049.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The glenoid track paradigm has played a pivotal role in the development of a contemporary approach to shoulder stabilization surgery. A number of studies have validated the importance of bipolar bone loss in the pathogenesis of recurrent anterior shoulder instability and defined the limitations of soft tissue-based, arthroscopic surgical approaches. The glenoid track paradigm has also helped to clarify the indications for coracoid transfer procedures, although some question persists as to the necessity of addressing an "off-track" Hill-Sachs lesion with remplissage concurrently with the Latarjet procedure for large glenoid bone defects. The best available evidence would suggest that the Latarjet procedure can be expected to yield favorable clinical outcomes even in the setting of an off-track Hill-Sachs lesion, thereby obviating the necessity of concomitant remplissage for cases involving advanced degrees of bipolar bone loss.
Medical subject headings
- Bankart Lesions
- Joint Instability
- Shoulder Dislocation
- Shoulder Joint
Anatomy
- shoulder