Imaging of Patients Suspected of SLAP Tear: A Cost-Effectiveness Study.

Abstract

<b>BACKGROUND</b>. Superior labrum anterior and posterior (SLAP) tears are a common shoulder pathology. Although MRI is the imaging reference standard for diagnosis of this pathology, the cost-effectiveness of common MRI strategies is unclear. <b>OBJECTIVE</b>. The primary objective of our study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of the common MRI-based strategies used for the diagnosis of SLAP tears. <b>METHODS</b>. We created decision analytic models from the perspective of the U.S. health care system over a 2-year time horizon for a hypothetical population of 25-year-old patients with a previous diagnosis of SLAP tear. We used the decision models to compare the differences in incremental cost-effectiveness of the common MRI strategies, which included combinations of 1.5-T and 3-T MR arthrography (MRA) and unenhanced MRI protocols, and the resulting treatment applied for these patients. Input data on cost, probability, and utility estimates were obtained through a comprehensive literature search. The primary effectiveness outcome was quality-adjusted life years. Costs were estimated in 2017 U.S. dollars. <b>RESULTS</b>. When all imaging strategies were considered, the unenhanced 3-T MRI-based imaging strategy was the preferred and dominant option over 3-T MRA and 1.5-T imaging (MRI and MRA). When the model was run without 3-T imaging as an option, 1.5-T MRA was the favored option. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed the same preferred imaging strategy results. <b>CONCLUSION</b>. An unenhanced 3-T MRI-based strategy is the most cost-effective imaging option for patients with suspected SLAP tear. When 3-T imaging is not available, 1.5-T MRA is more cost-effective than 1.5-T MRI. The main driver of these results is the fact that 3-T MRI and 1.5-T MRA are the most specific tests in these respective scenarios, which results in fewer false-positives, prevents unnecessary surgeries, and leads to decreased costs. <b>CLINICAL IMPACT</b>. Our cost-effectiveness model findings complement prior diagnostic accuracy work, helping produce a more comprehensive approach to define imaging utility for radiologists, clinicians, and patients with SLAP tears who have access to various types of MRI options.