<sup>18</sup>F-4FMFES and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Endometrial Carcinomas: Preliminary Report.

Paquette, Michel; Espinosa-Bentancourt, Esteban; Lavallée, Éric; Phoenix, Serge; Lapointe-Milot, Korine; Bessette, Paul; Guérin, Brigitte; Turcotte, Éric E · J Nucl Med · 2022

Where this comes from

Abstract

This article reports the preliminary results of a phase II clinical trial investigating the use of the estrogen receptor (ER)-targeting PET tracer 4-fluoro-11β-methoxy-16α-<sup>18</sup>F-fluoroestradiol (<sup>18</sup>F-4FMFES) and <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET in endometrial cancers. In parallel, noninvasive interventions were attempted to slow progression of <sup>18</sup>F-4FMFES metabolites in the intestines to reduce abdominal background uptake. <b>Methods:</b> In an ongoing study, 25 patients who received prior pathologic confirmation of an ER-positive endometrial cancer or endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia agreed to participate in the ongoing clinical trial. Patients were scheduled for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>18</sup>F-4FMFES PET/CT imaging in random order and within 2 wk. Patients were administered either 4 mg of loperamide orally before <sup>18</sup>F-4FMFES tracer injection or repeated intravenous injection of 20 mg of hyoscine <i>N</i>-butylbromide during <sup>18</sup>F-4FMFES PET/CT. Regions of interest covering the whole abdomen and excluding the liver, bladder, and uterus were drawn for the <sup>18</sup>F-4FMFES PET images, and an SUV threshold of more than 4 was applied. The volume of the resulting region was compared between the different interventions to estimate the extent of the intestinal background uptake. <b>Results:</b> Repeated injection of hyoscine <i>N</i>-butylbromide substantially reduced the intestinal background volume, whereas loperamide had a significant but moderate effect. <sup>18</sup>F-4FMFES tumor SUV<sub>max</sub> ranged from 3.0 to 14.4 (9.4 ± 3.2), whereas <sup>18</sup>F-FDG SUV<sub>max</sub> ranged from 0 to 22.0 (7.5 ± 5.1). Tumor-to-background ratio was significantly higher for <sup>18</sup>F-4FMFES (16.4 ± 5.4) than for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG (7.4 ± 4.6). Significant differences were observed between grade 1 and higher-grade tumors concerning <sup>18</sup>F-4FMFES uptake and contrast, <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake, and the <sup>18</sup>F-FDG/<sup>18</sup>F-4FMFES uptake ratio. <b>Conclusion:</b> It is possible to improve <sup>18</sup>F-4FMFES abdominal background using hyoscine <i>N</i>-butylbromide. Both <sup>18</sup>F-FDG and <sup>18</sup>F-4FMFES PET are suitable for detection of ER-positive endometrial cancers, although <sup>18</sup>F-4FMFES yielded a better tumor contrast than did <sup>18</sup>F-FDG.

Medical subject headings