Bone bridge fixation has superior biomechanics on posterior knees to bone plug fixation after lateral meniscal allograft transplantation - A biomechanical study simulating partial weight-bearing conditions.

Abstract

It remains unknown how biomechanics change in posterior lateral knee using different fixation techniques in lateral meniscal allograft transplantation (MAT)during simulated toe-touch partial weight-bearing. This study aimed tocompare the biomechanical effects on posterior knee between bridgeand bone plug fixation in lateral MAT. Intact knee, bone bridge fixation, and bone plug fixation were tested with 500 N of axial load during knee flexion at 0°, 30°, and 60°, which simulated toe-touch partial weight-bearing. Contact area and peak pressure were assessed on posterior knee and the shift of peak pressure position were measured. On the posterior lateral compartment, the contact mechanics of bone bridge fixation were similar to those of the intact knee (allP-values > 0.05), but its peak pressure was higher than that of intact knee at 60° (P = 0.002). For bone plug fixation, the contact area of the posterior lateral knee was significantly lower than those of intact knee and bone bridge fixation at 30° and 60° (allP-values < 0.05). The peak pressure of the posterior lateral knee was higher than that of the intact knee at all flexions and higher than that of bone bridge fixation at 30° and 60° (allP-values < 0.05). The peak pressure position of bone plug fixation shifted more laterally and posteriorly compared with intact knee and bone bridge fixation during knee flexion. Bone bridges could maintain posterior knee biomechanics better than bone plug fixation during knee bending during partial weight-bearing.