Medical Journals Should Be a Forum for Disruptive Research.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34481611.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.07.001.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Disruptive innovation completely changes the traditional way that we operate and may only be realized in retrospect. For example, shoulder superior capsule reconstruction (SCR) is a complete change from the traditional methods of treating massive, irreparable rotator cuff tears and pseudoparalysis. Classic examples of disruptions in orthopaedic surgery include distraction osteogenesis, total hip joint replacement arthroplasty, and modern orthopaedic trauma care. Orthopaedic technologies that promise future disruption include artificial intelligence, surgical simulation, and orthopaedic biologics, including mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) and gene therapy. Most of all, arthroscopic surgery completely changed the way we operate by using new methods and technology. Many never saw it coming. The challenge going forward is to motivate and foster new ideas and research that result in innovation and progress. Skepticism has a place, but not at the expense of transformative ideas, particularly as medical journals offer the alternative of prospective hypothesis testing using the scientific method, followed by unbiased peer review, and publication. Medical journals should be a forum for disruptive research.
Medical subject headings
- Periodicals as Topic
- Rotator Cuff Injuries
- Shoulder Joint
Anatomy
- shoulder