Editorial Commentary: All-Suture Anchors Are Small, Easier to Revise, and Biomechanically Equivalent to Conventional Implants: They Are the Way of the Future.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34481621.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.07.007.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
All-suture anchors (ASAs) show biomechanical equivalence to conventional implants. The smaller size and easier ability to revise are important advantages of ASAs. A more vertical insertion angle increases ASA pullout strength. Proper depth of insertion is required to optimally seat ASAs on cortical bone. ASA pullout strength also results from compression of cancellous bone between the anchor and the cortex, and appropriately pretensioning the suture before loading is critical. A larger anchor (and a higher the number of sutures loaded per anchor) leads to a higher pullout strength of the anchor. Understanding the correct implantation technique is important to optimize the strength of ASAs.
Medical subject headings
- Suture Anchors
- Sutures