On the Treatment of Optimization Problems With L1 Penalty Terms via Multiobjective Continuation.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34559634.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1109/TPAMI.2021.3114962.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We present a novel algorithm that allows us to gain detailed insight into the effects of sparsity in linear and nonlinear optimization. Sparsity is of great importance in many scientific areas such as image and signal processing, medical imaging, compressed sensing, and machine learning, as it ensures robustness against noisy data and yields models that are easier to interpret due to the small number of relevant terms. It is common practice to enforce sparsity by adding the l<sub>1</sub>-norm as a penalty term. In order to gain a better understanding and to allow for an informed model selection, we directly solve the corresponding multiobjective optimization problem (MOP) that arises when minimizing the main objective and the l<sub>1</sub>-norm simultaneously. As this MOP is in general non-convex for nonlinear objectives, the penalty method will fail to provide all optimal compromises. To avoid this issue, we present a continuation method specifically tailored to MOPs with two objective functions one of which is the l<sub>1</sub>-norm. Our method can be seen as a generalization of homotopy methods for linear regression problems to the nonlinear case. Several numerical examples - including neural network training - demonstrate our theoretical findings and the additional insight gained by this multiobjective approach.