Temocillin versus meropenem for the targeted treatment of bacteraemia due to third-generation cephalosporin-resistant <i>Enterobacterales</i> (ASTARTÉ): protocol for a randomised, pragmatic trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34580096.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049481 and PMC identifier 8477313.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Alternatives to carbapenems are needed in the treatment of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant <i>Enterobacterales</i> (3GCR-E). Temocillin is a suitable candidate, but comparative randomised studies are lacking. The objective is to investigate if temocillin is non-inferior to carbapenems in the targeted treatment of bacteraemia due to 3GCR-E. Multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, pragmatic phase 3 trial. Patients with bacteraemia due to 3GCR-E will be randomised to receive intravenously temocillin (2 g three times a day) or carbapenem (meropenem 1 g three times a day or ertapenem 1 g once daily). The primary endpoint will be clinical success 7-10 days after end of treatment with no recurrence or death at day 28. Adverse events will be collected; serum levels of temocillin will be investigated in a subset of patients. For a 10% non-inferiority margin, 334 patients will be included (167 in each study arm). For the primary analysis, the absolute difference with one-sided 95% CI in the proportion of patients reaching the primary endpoint will be compared in the modified intention-to-treat population. The study started after approval of the Spanish Regulatory Agency and the reference institutional review board. Data will be published in peer-reviewed journals. NCT04478721.
Medical subject headings
- Bacteremia
- Meropenem
- Penicillins