Synthesis of Pd<sub>3</sub> Sn and PdCuSn Nanorods with L1<sub>2</sub> Phase for Highly Efficient Electrocatalytic Ethanol Oxidation.

Zhou, Ming; Liu, Jiawei; Ling, Chongyi; Ge, Yiyao; Chen, Bo; Tan, Chaoliang; Fan, Zhanxi; Huang, Jingtao et al. · Adv Mater · 2022

basic_science · Level V

Where this comes from

Abstract

The crystal phase of nanomaterials is one of the key parameters determining their physicochemical properties and performance in various applications. However, it still remains a great challenge to synthesize nanomaterials with different crystal phases while maintaining the same composition, size, and morphology. Here, a facile, one-pot, wet-chemical method is reported to synthesize Pd<sub>3</sub> Sn nanorods with comparable size and morphology but different crystal phases, that is, an ordered intermetallic and a disordered alloy with L1<sub>2</sub> and face-centered cubic (fcc) phases, respectively. The crystal phase of the as-synthesized Pd<sub>3</sub> Sn nanorods is easily tuned by altering the types of tin precursors and solvents. Moreover, the approach can also be used to synthesize ternary PdCuSn nanorods with the L1<sub>2</sub> crystal phase. When used as electrocatalysts, the L1<sub>2</sub> Pd<sub>3</sub> Sn nanorods exhibit superior electrocatalytic performance toward the ethanol oxidation reaction (EOR) compared to their fcc counterpart. Impressively, compared to the L1<sub>2</sub> Pd<sub>3</sub> Sn nanorods, the ternary L1<sub>2</sub> PdCuSn nanorods exhibit more enhanced electrocatalytic performance toward the EOR, yielding a high mass current density up to 6.22 A mg<sub>Pd</sub> <sup>-1</sup> , which is superior to the commercial Pd/C catalyst and among the best reported Pd-based EOR electrocatalysts.