A customized percutaneous three-dimensional-printed guide for scaphoid fixation versus a freehand technique: a comparative study.
prospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34647500.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/17531934211049132.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and reliability of percutaneous fixation of minimally displaced scaphoid fractures using a customized three-dimensional (3-D)-printed guide with a conventional freehand method. A prospective cohort of ten patients underwent scaphoid fixation with the aid of a customized 3-D-printed guide. The final screw position, total surgery time (minutes) and fluoroscopy time (seconds) was compared with a retrospective cohort of ten patients who underwent fixation with a conventional technique. There were no differences in final screw position between both methods. The patients in which the 3-D guide was used had a surgery time reduction of 43% and a fluoroscopy time reduction of 52% compared with the control freehand group. The use of a customized 3-D-printed guide permits a fixation that is as accurate as the standard freehand technique, with reduction in surgical time and intraoperative radiation exposure.<b>Level of evidence:</b> III.
Medical subject headings
- Fractures, Bone
- Scaphoid Bone
Anatomy
- hand