Radiation Oncology Alternative Payment Model and Large Urban Academic Centers: Future Implications for Patients and Providers.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34678044.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1200/OP.21.00347 and PMC identifier 9810124.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The radiation oncology alternative payment model (RO-APM) was developed by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation, a part of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, as a vehicle to optimize value for patients undergoing radiation therapy. By shifting reimbursement away from fee-for-service and toward a prospective bundled payment system, the RO-APM is intended to bend the cost curve in radiation oncology while preserving or even enhancing outcomes. As with prior large-scale policy initiatives, the nature and magnitude of the RO-APM's impact on care delivery will vary substantially depending on a host of local factors, including practice setting. Urban academic centers play a key role in radiation oncology by spearheading innovation, managing the most complicated cases, training the next generation of radiation oncologists, and often caring for vulnerable patient populations. Thus, to protect patients' access to this high-quality cancer care, it will be crucial to characterize the RO-APM's projected impact on large urban academic institutions before its implementation, including possible unintended adverse consequences. Here, we provide an overview of this seismic change in radiation oncology reimbursement and discuss its unique potential implications for large urban academic institutions as a means to facilitate necessary preparations and inform future revisions to the model.
Medical subject headings
- Radiation Oncology