The reliability of clinical assessment of distal radioulnar joint instability.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34727760.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/17531934211054282.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Accurate assessment of distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) stability is increasingly recognized as an important part of clinical examination of the wrist. The ability of 30 specialist UK hand surgeons to clinically determine the stability of four volunteers' wrists was assessed. Volunteers' wrist stability had previously been confirmed with a validated measurement rig. Use of the wrist ballottement test as the primary examination technique yielded a positive predictive value of 81%, a negative predictive value of 55%, a specificity of 94% and a sensitivity of only 24%, for the detection of DRUJ instability. No correlation between background speciality (orthopaedic versus plastic surgery), nor years of clinical experience was found. Clinical assessment of DRUJ instability among experienced clinicians appears unreliable and instability is typically under recognized. Previous research to date using this clinical assessment method as a parameter of success is therefore brought into question.<b>Level of evidence:</b> IV.
Medical subject headings
- Joint Instability
Anatomy
- wrist
- radius/ulna