Factors Influencing a Clinician-Scientist Career Path in Otolaryngology.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34773409.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/lary.29940.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To better understand the obstacles facing residents and K-awardee faculty in choosing a clinician-scientist career in otolaryngology. Anonymous survey. An anonymous, online Qualtrics survey was sent to residents participating in T32 training grants and K-awardee junior faculty. The survey was sent to the residents with the permission of their program chair. The results of this survey were compiled and analyzed. A separate survey was sent to current K-awardees in U.S. academic programs. Both surveys were then compared to a survey published in 2008 to determine if the concerns and obstacles faced by aspiring clinician-scientists are still present. Residents felt that combining a research and clinical career presented many obstacles, including a lower salary, competition with PhDs for grant funding, and the lack of departmental support. Prolonging their training to include a fellowship was not a deterrent. Family/spousal issues which ranked as the primary concern previously were no longer given the same level of importance. The major concerns of K-awardees were the economic disparity of clinician-scientists with their clinical counterparts, the lack of mentors, and department support. Forty percent received their K-award after first try, 100% after two revisions, and one has received an R grant funding. The obstacles facing clinician-scientists in otolaryngology are highlighted by this survey and require attention by our academic programs, National Institutes of Health, and specialty societies. NA Laryngoscope, 132:1555-1560, 2022.
Medical subject headings
- Career Choice
- Otolaryngology
- Research Personnel