CT Morphometric Analysis of Medial Tibial Condyles: Are the Currently Available Designs of Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Suitable for Indian Knees?
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34824713.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s43465-021-00429-y and PMC identifier 8586401.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The main purpose of this study is to assess the compatibility of medial tibial condyle (MTC) morphometry of Indian population with that of six contemporary UKA prostheses tibial components. We hypothesized that from the currently available UKA designs at least one would fit the MTC morphometry optimally as per the manufacturer's recommendation. We used CT morphometric data of 100 (66 males and 34 females) consecutive nonarthritic adult knees with reference to the MTC to assess the compatibility of currently available (in India) UKA prostheses. Each MTC was measured in the anteroposterior dimension, mediolateral at pre-defined points and the MTC aspect ratio calculated. Proportion of knees which could be optimally fitted with the existing UKA tibial components was calculated. The mean age was 39.6 (SD 15.9) years. Anteroposterior and mediolateral dimensions in males were higher as compared to females (<i>p</i> < 0.001). As the anteroposterior dimension increased, the MTC aspect ratio decreased. There was asymmetry of anteroposterior halves with maximum mediolateral width being posterior to the central mediolateral width by 5.5 (SD 2.8) mm. Optimal anteroposterior fit ranged from 66 to 93%. However, optimal mediolateral fit as well, ranged from 5 to 37% with underhang present in 17-61% and > 2 mm medial overhang present in 0-35% cases. In 23% of cases, not a single implant could be fitted optimally. Currently available UKA implants do not provide optimal tibial fit in nearly 25% of Indian patients. A surgeon needs to be aware of these limitations of existing implants when considering UKA.
Anatomy
- knee
- tibia