A study to compare strengths of cadaveric tendon repairs with round-bodied and cutting needles.
biomechanical · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34878950.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1177/17531934211064201.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This human cadaver study investigated whether flexor tendon repairs performed with round-bodied needles had a higher risk of pull-out compared with those performed with cutting needles. Forty human cadaver tendons were repaired (20 with each type of needle), subjected to tensile traction testing and evaluated by failure load and mode of failure. The average failure load was 50 N (SD 13 N) for tendons repaired with round-bodied needles, compared with 49 N (SD 16 N) for tendons repaired with cutting needles. Round-bodied needles resulted in more suture pull-out (18 out of 20 tendons) than cutting needles (6 out of 20 tendons). We found no differences in failure load, but significant differences in the mode of failure between round-bodied and cutting needles when used for cadaveric flexor tendon repair.
Medical subject headings
- Needles
- Tendon Injuries