Management of instability after primary total knee arthroplasty: an evidence-based review.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34930375.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1186/s13018-021-02878-5 and PMC identifier 8686357.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Instability is one of the most common reasons for revision after a total knee replacement. It accounts for 17.4% of all single-stage revision procedures performed in the UK National Joint Registry. Through a careful patient evaluation, physical assessment and review of investigations one can identify the likely type of instability. To critically examine the different types of instability, their presentation and evidence-based management options. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to identify articles relevant to the aetiology and management of instability in total knee replacements. Instability should be categorised as isolated or global and then, as flexion, mid-flexion, extension or recurvatum types. By identifying the aetiology of instability one can correctly restore balance and stability. With careful judgement and meticulous surgical planning, instability can be addressed and revision surgery can provide patients with successful outcomes.
Medical subject headings
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
- Joint Instability
- Knee Joint
- Knee Prosthesis
Anatomy
- knee