A three-dimensional (3D) printing approach to fabricate an isolation chip for high throughput <i>in situ</i> cultivation of environmental microbes.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34935836.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1039/d1lc00723h.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The full plethora of environmental bacteria is often poorly represented <i>in vitro</i> as the majority remain difficult, if not impossible, to culture under standard laboratory settings. These bacteria often require native conditions for the formation of cell masses that collectively have higher chances of survival. With that, a 3D-printed version of the isolation chip (iChip) was used to cultivate bacteria from a tropical peat swamp <i>in situ</i> prior to growth and maintenance <i>in vitro</i>. Briefly, plates made from either acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS), polylactic acid (PLA), or epoxy resin were tested in terms of their usability and durability under acidic conditions similar to those of peat matter. The epoxy resin plates were then found to be most optimal for the sampling conditions. Peat soil samples were collected from the base of a <i>Koompassia malaccensis</i> tree and reconstituted in molten 10% (wt/vol) tryptone soy agar (TSA) prior to inoculation. The iChips were subsequently assembled and buried in the site of origin. As a comparison, bacteria from the same soil sample were cultivated directly on TSA and incubated at 28 °C for two weeks. Thereafter, agar plugs from the iChip were transferred to TSA plates to allow microcolonies within each plug to grow. Each pure isolate from both cultivation approaches that grew was then pooled and extracted for total DNA prior to 16S rRNA gene amplification and sequencing <i>via</i> Illumina MiSeq. Taxonomic abundance comparison revealed that the bacterial taxa at the level of order were significantly different between the two approaches, particularly in the orders, <i>Burkholderiales</i>, <i>Xanthomonodales</i>, <i>Enterobacteriales</i>, and <i>Actinomycetales</i> (differences of 12.0, 7.1, 8.0, and 4.2%, respectively). This indicated that the 3D-printed iChips present a possible low-cost tool for the isolation of bacterial genera that may not be able to grow on media directly <i>in vitro</i>.
Medical subject headings
- Bacteria
- Printing, Three-Dimensional