Connecting the dots: The boons and banes of network modeling.
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 34950902.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100374 and PMC identifier 8672149.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Network modeling transforms data into a structure of nodes and edges such that edges represent relationships between pairs of objects, then extracts clusters of densely connected nodes in order to capture high-dimensional relationships hidden in the data. This efficient and flexible strategy holds potential for unveiling complex patterns concealed within massive datasets, but standard implementations overlook several key issues that can undermine research efforts. These issues range from data imputation and discretization to correlation metrics, clustering methods, and validation of results. Here, we enumerate these pitfalls and provide practical strategies for alleviating their negative effects. These guidelines increase prospects for future research endeavors as they reduce type I and type II (false-positive and false-negative) errors and are generally applicable for network modeling applications across diverse domains.