Laboratory Indices in Patients with Positive and Borderline Flow Cytometry Eosin-5-Maleimide-Screening Test Results for Hereditary Spherocytosis.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35033565.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.11.074.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate laboratory indices in patients with hereditary spherocytosis, with positive and borderline flow cytometry eosin-5-melamide (EMA)-bound red blood cells screening test. We compared laboratory indices of 151 samples obtained from 139 different individual patients with negative, borderline, or positive EMA-test results. We also compared the clinical data of the patients in each EMA test results group. Borderline EMA-test results were obtained for 13 patients and were associated with more severe anemia, and lower reticulocyte count and reticulocyte production index compared with samples with positive EMA-test results. A receiving operator characteristic analysis identified mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration of <32.5 g/dL as a cut-off, between positive/borderline and negative test results with 100% sensitivity. A higher prevalence of clinical markers typical of hereditary spherocytosis was found in patients with borderline or positive compared with negative EMA test samples. Based on laboratory data, borderline EMA-test results may be an indication of a more severe form of hereditary spherocytosis. Using mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration as a cut-off may help predict and reduce negative EMA tests without compromising sensitivity. This finding needs to be further validated in other flow cytometry laboratories with a large EMA test sample pool.
Medical subject headings
- Laboratories
- Spherocytosis, Hereditary