Analysis of social combinations of COVID-19 vaccination: Evidence from a conjoint analysis.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35061690.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0261426 and PMC identifier 8782289.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Using a conjoint analysis based on Japanese cases, this study attempts to identify a preferable social strategic combination of who are vaccinated, who are not, and who are waiting. Using two surveys that relied on quota sampling reflecting the Japanese demographic composition (n = 1024 & n = 2975), the results of the descriptive analysis show that the most preferred strategy at the individual level was wait-and-see, allowing for a risk assessment of side effects. Via conjoint analysis, I also found that participants who recalled blood relatives as their familiar entities tended to prefer a wait-and-see strategy for themselves and their blood relatives. The results of these analyses suggest that wait-and-see strategies for vaccination are preferred in Japan, making it difficult to achieve early herd immunity through vaccination.
Medical subject headings
- COVID-19
- COVID-19 Vaccines
- Vaccination