Perception of fairness in algorithmic decisions: Future developers' perspective.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35079711.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100380 and PMC identifier 8767291.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In this work, we investigate how students in fields adjacent to algorithms development perceive fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics in algorithmic decision-making. Participants (N = 99) were asked to rate their agreement with statements regarding six constructs that are related to facets of fairness and justice in algorithmic decision-making using scenarios, in addition to defining algorithmic fairness and providing their view on possible causes of unfairness, transparency approaches, and accountability. The findings indicate that "agreeing" with a decision does not mean that the person "deserves the outcome," perceiving the factors used in the decision-making as "appropriate" does not make the decision of the system "fair," and perceiving a system's decision as "not fair" is affecting the participants' "trust" in the system. Furthermore, fairness is most likely to be defined as the use of "objective factors," and participants identify the use of "sensitive attributes" as the most likely cause of unfairness.