Fetal Protection Policies and Corporate Liability of the US Vinyl Chloride Industry, 1974-1991.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35080929.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306539 and PMC identifier 8802595.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In the late 20th century, fetal protection policies barred women from hundreds of thousands of industrial jobs on the pretext that if women became pregnant, their fetuses might be harmed by workplace exposure to toxic chemicals. Beginning in the 1970s, these policies set off a decades-long contest between the chemical industry, government agencies, and the judicial system over how to balance the uncertain reproductive health risks against sex discrimination. This article revives the subject of reproductive health and workplace protections through a historical case study of fetal protection policies at Firestone Plastics, a leader in the postwar vinyl chloride industry. I use formerly secret industry documents to argue that Firestone used scientific uncertainty and gender essentialism to skirt new regulatory pressures and minimize corporate liability. Ultimately, fetal protection policies stymied innovative regulatory efforts to protect all workers-not just women-from reproductive hazards in the workplace. (<i>Am J Public Health</i>. 2022;112(2):271-276. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306539).
Medical subject headings
- Health Policy
- Occupational Exposure
- Occupational Health
- Vinyl Chloride
- Women's Rights