Head-to-Head Comparison of Kinematic Alignment Versus Mechanical Alignment for Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Abstract

Seeing as there are many alignment strategies for total knee arthroplasty (TKA), we need to determine differences between them in a rigorous scientific way. Therefore, we sought to compare perioperative and postoperative functional outcomes in patients undergoing TKA for varus osteoarthritis with a mechanical alignment target vs a kinematic alignment target, both executed with the same implant and same technological guidance. One hundred consecutive patients who underwent TKA using a mechanical alignment technique were 1:1 matched to 100 patients who underwent TKA using a kinematic alignment (KA) technique, using the same implant and robotic technology. Patient-reported outcomes were measured postoperatively at 1 and 2 years. Power analysis revealed 94 patients to detect a significant difference. Mean Visual Analog Scale scores were higher in the mechanical alignment group during the first 6 weeks (P = .04), but statistically similar at 1 year. Six-week Veterans RAND 12 Item Health Survey mental and physical components were statistically similar (P = .1). Patients did not differ in 6-week or 1-year knee range of motion (P > .43). Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Joint Replacement was significantly better in the KA group at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years (P = .09). Forgotten Joint Score at 1 and 2 years postoperatively were significantly higher in the KA group (P < .001). Patients undergoing TKA with KA experienced less pain in 6 weeks after surgery, and higher Forgotten Joint Scores at 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Alternative TKA alignment and balancing strategies should be considered to increase patient satisfaction.