Demystifying Qualitative Research for Musculoskeletal Practitioners Part 5: Rigor in Qualitative Research.
editorial · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35100817.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2519/jospt.2022.10487.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
In part 5 of this series, we turn our attention to concepts of rigor in qualitative research. In doing so, the use of quality appraisal tools and reporting checklists for qualitative studies is explored. Issues regarding a one-size-fits-all approach to these tools and checklists are discussed. Trustworthiness criteria are also described and applied to different qualitative paradigms and methodological approaches. <i>J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2022;52(2):60-62. doi:10.2519/jospt.2022.10487</i>.
Medical subject headings
- Checklist