Clinical practice guidelines: The good, the bad, and the ugly.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35135686.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2022.01.047.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Clinical practices guidelines (CPGs) play a fundamental role in improving healthcare and patients' outcomes by helping clinicians make the best evidence-based decisions for their patients in a time-efficient manner. By following the available methods and criteria to create trustworthy CPGs, panel members can develop high-quality guidelines. However, despite the improvements over the years, CPGs are still subjected to biases and limitations, with conflicts of interest being the ugliest problem GCPs must face. In this review, we discuss the main characteristics of clinical practice guidelines, their pros and cons, and the future challenges they need to overcome.
Medical subject headings
- Delivery of Health Care
- Practice Guidelines as Topic