Stabilisation of AO OTA 31-A unstable proximal femoral fractures: Does the choice of intramedullary nail affect the incidence of post-operative complications? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
meta_analysis · Level I
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35151468.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.injury.2022.02.002.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine if there was a difference in the risk of post-operative complications associated with the use of different intramedullary (IM) devices in the treatment of unstable AO OTA 31-A trochanteric fractures. Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. A systematic literature review was carried out in January 2022 in the Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane databases. Studies comparing INTERTAN™ to other intramedullary nails for the treatment of AO OTA 31-A trochanteric fractures were selected for inclusion. After data extraction, meta-analyses were carried out on postoperative outcomes, with specific focus placed on unstable fracture patterns. Twenty-three studies were suitable for inclusion, of which seventeen reported on outcomes in unstable fractures. INTERTAN reduced the risk of revision/reoperation by 64% (RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.54, p <0.0001), implant failures by 62% (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.57, p<0.0001) and hip and thigh pain by 50% (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.35 to 0.71, p=0.0001) in unstable fractures. No differences were noted between IM nail designs for infection rates, healing time, non-union rates, femoral shortening, or Harris Hip Score. The INTERTAN IM nail may reduce incidence of implant-related complications, hip and thigh pain, and the need for revision/reoperation without compromising clinical and functional outcomes.
Medical subject headings
- Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary
- Hip Fractures