Health Benefits of Strategies for Carbon Mitigation in US Transportation, 2017‒2050.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35196040.
- Also identified by DOI 10.2105/AJPH.2021.306600 and PMC identifier 8887169.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
<b>Objectives.</b> To quantify health benefits and carbon emissions of 2 transportation scenarios that contrast optimum levels of physical activity from active travel and minimal air pollution from electric cars. <b>Methods.</b> We used data on burden of disease, travel, and vehicle emissions in the US population and a health impact model to assess health benefits and harms of physical activity from transportation-related walking and cycling, fine particulate pollution from car emissions, and road traffic injuries. We compared baseline travel with walking and cycling a median of 150 weekly minutes for physical activity, and with electric cars that minimized carbon pollution and fine particulates. <b>Results.</b> In 2050, the target year for carbon neutrality, the active travel scenario avoided 167 000 deaths and gained 2.5 million disability-adjusted life years, monetized at $1.6 trillion using the value of a statistical life. Carbon emissions were reduced by 24% from baseline. Electric cars avoided 1400 deaths and gained 16 400 disability-adjusted life years, monetized at $13 billion. <b>Conclusions.</b> To achieve carbon neutrality in transportation and maximize health benefits, active travel should have a prominent role along with electric vehicles in national blueprints. (<i>Am J Public Health</i>. 2022; 112(3):426-433. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306600).
Medical subject headings
- Air Pollution
- Carbon
- Exercise
- Health Impact Assessment
- Transportation