Ethnic and Sex Diversity in Academic Orthopaedic Surgery: A Cross-sectional Study.
cross_sectional · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35258489.
- Also identified by DOI 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00321 and PMC identifier 8906469.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-ND.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Although the diversity in orthopaedic residency programs has been studied, the diversity within academic orthopaedics has not. The board of specialty societies, five leading journals and the National Institutes of Health RePORTER tool, and three accreditation organizations were explored. The board of directors comprised 220 (72%) Caucasians, 36 (12%) Asians, 4 (1%) Hispanic/Latinos, 29 (9%) African Americans, and 18 (6%) Other individuals; 250 (81%) were men, and 57 (19%) were women. The editorial boards comprised 288 (77%) Caucasians, 62 (16%) Asians, 14 (4%) Hispanic/Latinos, 8 (2%) African Americans, and 4 (1%) Other individuals; 341 (91%) were men, and 35 (9%) were women. The National Institutes of Health grant recipients comprised 117 (64%) Caucasians, 58 (32%) Asians, 4 (2%) Hispanic/Latinos, and 3 (2%) African Americans; 128 (70%) were men, and 54 (30%) were women. On average, Caucasians, Asians, Hispanic/Latinos, and African Americans received $776,543, $439,600, $420,182, and $494,049, respectively. On average, men and women received $759,426 and $419,518, respectively. The accreditation boards comprised 45 (82%) Caucasians, 6 (11%) Asians, and 4 (7%) African Americans; 45 (82%) were men, and 10 (18%) were women. Academic orthopaedic surgery does not resemble the United States. Residency, fellowship committees, and professional organization boards need to become aware of these disparities.
Medical subject headings
- Orthopedic Procedures
- Orthopedics