Deep learning-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET - a multi-tracer study with <sup>18</sup>F-FDG, <sup>68</sup> Ga-DOTATATE, and <sup>18</sup>F-Fluciclovine.
other · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35277742.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1007/s00259-022-05748-2 and PMC identifier 10725742.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
A novel deep learning (DL)-based attenuation correction (AC) framework was applied to clinical whole-body oncology studies using <sup>18</sup>F-FDG, <sup>68</sup> Ga-DOTATATE, and <sup>18</sup>F-Fluciclovine. The framework used activity (λ-MLAA) and attenuation (µ-MLAA) maps estimated by the maximum likelihood reconstruction of activity and attenuation (MLAA) algorithm as inputs to a modified U-net neural network with a novel imaging physics-based loss function to learn a CT-derived attenuation map (µ-CT). Clinical whole-body PET/CT datasets of <sup>18</sup>F-FDG (N = 113), <sup>68</sup> Ga-DOTATATE (N = 76), and <sup>18</sup>F-Fluciclovine (N = 90) were used to train and test tracer-specific neural networks. For each tracer, forty subjects were used to train the neural network to predict attenuation maps (µ-DL). µ-DL and µ-MLAA were compared to the gold-standard µ-CT. PET images reconstructed using the OSEM algorithm with µ-DL (OSEM<sub>DL</sub>) and µ-MLAA (OSEM<sub>MLAA</sub>) were compared to the CT-based reconstruction (OSEM<sub>CT</sub>). Tumor regions of interest were segmented by two radiologists and tumor SUV and volume measures were reported, as well as evaluation using conventional image analysis metrics. µ-DL yielded high resolution and fine detail recovery of the attenuation map, which was superior in quality as compared to µ-MLAA in all metrics for all tracers. Using OSEM<sub>CT</sub> as the gold-standard, OSEM<sub>DL</sub> provided more accurate tumor quantification than OSEM<sub>MLAA</sub> for all three tracers, e.g., error in SUV<sub>max</sub> for OSEM<sub>MLAA</sub> vs. OSEM<sub>DL</sub>: - 3.6 ± 4.4% vs. - 1.7 ± 4.5% for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG (N = 152), - 4.3 ± 5.1% vs. 0.4 ± 2.8% for <sup>68</sup> Ga-DOTATATE (N = 70), and - 7.3 ± 2.9% vs. - 2.8 ± 2.3% for <sup>18</sup>F-Fluciclovine (N = 44). OSEM<sub>DL</sub> also yielded more accurate tumor volume measures than OSEM<sub>MLAA</sub>, i.e., - 8.4 ± 14.5% (OSEM<sub>MLAA</sub>) vs. - 3.0 ± 15.0% for <sup>18</sup>F-FDG, - 14.1 ± 19.7% vs. 1.8 ± 11.6% for <sup>68</sup> Ga-DOTATATE, and - 15.9 ± 9.1% vs. - 6.4 ± 6.4% for <sup>18</sup>F-Fluciclovine. The proposed framework provides accurate and robust attenuation correction for whole-body <sup>18</sup>F-FDG, <sup>68</sup> Ga-DOTATATE and <sup>18</sup>F-Fluciclovine in tumor SUV measures as well as tumor volume estimation. The proposed method provides clinically equivalent quality as compared to CT in attenuation correction for the three tracers.
Medical subject headings
- Deep Learning
- Neoplasms