Swimming-Induced Pulmonary Edema: Evaluation of Prehospital Treatment With CPAP or Positive Expiratory Pressure Device.
case_series · Level IV
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35288117.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.chest.2022.02.054 and PMC identifier 9424325.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Swimming-induced pulmonary edema (SIPE) occasionally occurs during swimming in cold open water. Although optimal treatment for SIPE is unknown, non-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) is an option for prehospital treatment. Is NPPV a feasible and safe prehospital treatment for SIPE, and which outcome measures reflect recovery after treatment? A prospective observational study was conducted at Vansbrosimningen, Sweden's largest open water swimming event, from 2017 through 2019. Swimmers with a diagnosis of SIPE and with peripheral oxygen saturation (Spo<sub>2</sub>) of ≤ 95%, persistent respiratory symptoms, or both were eligible for the study. NPPV was administered on site as CPAP by facial mask or as positive expiratory pressure (PEP) by a PEP device. Discharge criteria were Spo<sub>2</sub> of > 95% and clinical recovery. Four outcome measures were evaluated: Spo<sub>2</sub>, crackles on pulmonary auscultation, pulmonary edema on lung ultrasound (LUS), and patient-reported respiratory symptoms. Of 119 treated individuals, 94 received CPAP, 24 received treatment with a PEP device, and one required tracheal intubation. In total, 108 individuals (91%) were discharged after NPPV for a median of 10 to 20 min and 11 individuals (9%) required hospital transfer. NPPV resulted in increased Spo<sub>2</sub> from a median of 91% to 97% (P < .0001) together with improvement of six patient-reported respiratory symptoms (median numerical rating scales, 1-7 to 0-1; P < .0001). No significant decrease in auscultation of crackles (93% vs 87%; P = .508) or pulmonary edema on LUS (100% vs 97%; P = .500) was seen during NPPV treatment. NPPV administered as CPAP or via a PEP device proved feasible and safe as prehospital treatment for SIPE with a vast majority of patients discharged on site. Spo<sub>2</sub> and patient-reported respiratory symptoms reflected recovery after treatment, whereas pulmonary auscultation or LUS findings did not.
Medical subject headings
- Emergency Medical Services
- Pulmonary Edema