Pro-Con Debate: Prehospital Blood Transfusion-Should It Be Adopted for Civilian Trauma?
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35299208.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1213/ANE.0000000000005747.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Exsanguination is the leading cause of death in severely injured patients; nevertheless, prehospital blood transfusion (PHT) remains a controversial topic. Here, we review the pros and cons of PHT, which is now routine in treatment of military trauma patients in the civilian setting. While PHT may improve survival in those who suffer blunt injury or require prolonged transport from the site of injury, PHT for civilian trauma generally is not supported by high-quality evidence. This article was originally presented as a pro-con debate at the 2020 meeting of the European Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care.
Medical subject headings
- Emergency Medical Services
- Wounds and Injuries
- Wounds, Nonpenetrating