Radiologic-pathologic correlation of major versus minor extranodal extension in oral cavity cancer.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35315548.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/hed.27036.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiologic extranodal extension (rENE) in predicting major (>2 mm) and minor (≤2 mm) pathologic ENE (pENE). All oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma patients who underwent neck dissection with pathological nodal disease (pN+) between 2010 and 2015 were reviewed. Preoperative computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging were reviewed by two head and neck neuroradiologists. Three hundred and thirty-four patients were included. The sensitivity and specificity of rENE were 37% [95% CI 29-44] and 98% [95% CI 96-100], respectively. Sensitivity for pENE improved in the subset of patients with major ENE (48% [95% CI 38-57]). The presence of rENE was associated with inferior 3-year overall survival: 26% [95% CI 17-41] versus 60% [95% CI 54-67]. This large cohort study demonstrates high specificity, but low sensitivity for preoperative imaging in the detection of pENE in OCSCC. Patients with rENE demonstrated poor OS. pENE in the absence of rENE is still an adverse risk factor.
Medical subject headings
- Head and Neck Neoplasms
- Mouth Neoplasms