Lobectomy Provides the Best Survival for Stage I Lung Cancer Patients Despite Advanced Age.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35351425.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2022.03.031.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The Lung Cancer Study Group has shown that lobectomy provides the best survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. However, as patients become older, lobectomy may not provide a survival advantage compared with sublobar resection. We analyzed the National Cancer Database for octogenarians with pathologic stage I lung cancer from 2004 to 2016. We then evaluated the patients who underwent lobectomy or sublobar (segmentectomy or wedge) resection for the treatment of cancer. We analyzed the 5-year survival rates of the groups as well as a cubic spline plot to determine age cutoffs where lobectomy does not provide improved survival. Among the octogenarians (227 134), there were 25 362 (26%) who had pathologic stage I lung cancer. There were 6370 (30%) patients who had sublobar resections (segmentectomy [n = 1192] and wedge resection [n = 5178]), whereas 14 594 (70%) patients had a lobectomy. There was significantly improved survival at 5 years with lobectomy compared with sublobar resection (48.5% vs 41.1%; P < .001). The cubic spline plot provided evidence that there was no age at which sublobar resection provided survival better than or equal to lobectomy (P < .001). In octogenarians with pathologic stage I lung cancer, lobectomy provided better 5-year survival compared with sublobar resection regardless of the age at surgical procedure. Hence, all patients with stage I cancer should be considered for a lobectomy if they are medically able to tolerate such a procedure.
Medical subject headings
- Lung Neoplasms
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung