Caregiver Reports of Infant Distress and Injury in Abused Infants.
case_control · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35351533.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.jpeds.2022.02.056.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To determine whether in infants evaluated for physical abuse, medical encounters for infant distress are correlated with physical abuse or a history of sentinel injuries. This retrospective, case-control analysis of infants aged <12 months evaluated for physical abuse identified demographic characteristics, prior injuries, and medical encounters for infant distress. Variables were compared between abused infants and nonabused infants with and without sentinel injuries. A nonparametric recursive classification tree analysis assessed interactions between variables. Infant distress was associated with abuse (67.9% vs 44.7%; P = .008; OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3-5.2). Infants with sentinel injuries had higher rates of infant distress (74.1% vs 42.4%; P ≤ .001) and crying (81.5% vs 62.7%; P = .012). Previous falls (32.6% vs 18.1%; P = .03) and nonsentinel injuries (18.2% vs 5.4%; P = .002) also were associated with abuse, although sentinel injuries were the most important predictor of abuse, followed by infant distress. Infants with medical encounters for distress and injury may be at higher risk for abuse and may benefit from intensive educational and support services for their caregivers. Additional research evaluating the most effective interventions for caregivers of fussy infants is needed.
Medical subject headings
- Caregivers
- Child Abuse