Empathic Communication in Specialty Palliative Care Encounters: An Analysis of Opportunities and Responses.

Abstract

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Although empathic responding is considered a core competency in specialty palliative care (PC), patterns of empathic communication in PC encounters are not well understood. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> In this secondary analysis, we delineate types and frequency of empathic communication and examine relationships between patient empathic opportunities and clinician responses. <b><i>Design:</i></b> We used the Empathic Communication Coding System to analyze empathic opportunities across three types: <i>emotion</i> (i.e., negative affective state), <i>progress</i> (i.e., stated recent positive life event or development), and <i>challenge</i> (i.e., stated problem or recent, negative life-changing event) and clinician responses. <b><i>Setting/Subjects:</i></b> Transcripts from a pilot randomized trial of communication coaching in specialty PC encounters (<i>N</i> = 71) audio-recorded by 22 PC clinicians at two sites in the United States: an academic health system and a community-based hospice and PC organization. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Empathic opportunities were frequent across encounters; clinicians often responded empathically to those opportunities (e.g., <i>confirming</i> or <i>acknowledging</i> patients' emotions or experiences). Even though challenge empathic opportunities occurred most frequently, clinicians responded empathically more often to progress opportunities (i.e., 93% of the time) than challenge opportunities (i.e., 75% of the time). One in 12 opportunities was impeded by the patient or a family member changing the topic before the clinician could respond. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> PC patients frequently express emotions, share progress, or divulge challenges as empathic opportunities. Clinicians often convey empathy in response and can differentiate their empathic responses based on the type of empathic opportunity. PC communication research and training should explore which empathic responses promote desired patient outcomes.