Comparison of conventional and transtrapezial palmar approaches for screw fixation of scaphoid waist fractures: a clinical study.

Abstract

We investigated two palmar approaches for screw fixation of acute scaphoid waist fractures: the conventional percutaneous or transtrapezial approach. Thirty cases who underwent operation from 2013 to 2021 were reviewed (conventional group, 15; transtrapezial approach group, 15). Cross-sections were constructed along the long axis of the scaphoid on postoperative computed tomography to evaluate the screw position, relative to the centre point in the distal-third, midwaist and proximal-third of the bone. The screw could be inserted centrally in the proximal and distal regions using the transtrapezial approach. In the conventional approach, the screw was inserted radially in the distal region, but tended to be positioned centrally in the midwaist and proximal regions. As central placement of the screw in the proximal fragment offers a biomechanical advantage, both approaches can be options for some fracture patterns, while for others, the fracture pattern could influence which approach is better.<b>Level of evidence:</b> IV.