Is typifying systematic reviews and meta-analysis as the top on the ladder justified?
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35495801.
- Also identified by DOI 10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_2367_21 and PMC identifier 9051731.
- Licence recorded as CC BY-NC-SA.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
A large number-possibly the large majority-of systematic reviews and meta-analyses produced to date may not be useful for various reasons. This article though not ruling out the usefulness of these, is raising concerns on the way these are conducted or intended for in terms of outcomes.