The effects of antibiotic cycling and mixing on acquisition of antibiotic resistant bacteria in the ICU: A post-hoc individual patient analysis of a prospective cluster-randomized crossover study.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35503768.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0265720 and PMC identifier 9064081.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Repeated rotation of empiric antibiotic treatment strategies is hypothesized to reduce antibiotic resistance. Clinical rotation studies failed to change unit-wide prevalence of antibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB) carriage, including an international cluster-randomized crossover study. Unit-wide effects may differ from individual effects due to "ecological fallacy". This post-hoc analysis of a cluster-randomized crossover study assesses differences between cycling and mixing rotation strategies in acquisition of carriage with Gram-negative ARB in individual patients. This was a controlled cluster-randomized crossover study in 7 ICUs in 5 European countries. Clinical cultures taken as routine care were used for endpoint assessment. Patients with a first negative culture and at least one culture collected in total were included. Community acquisitions (2 days of admission or less) were excluded. Primary outcome was ICU-acquisition of Enterobacterales species with reduced susceptibility to: third- or fourth generation cephalosporins or piperacillin-tazobactam, and Acinetobacter species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with reduced susceptibility for piperacillin-tazobactam or carbapenems. Cycling (altering first-line empiric therapy for Gram-negative bacteria, every other 6-weeks), to mixing (changing antibiotic type every empiric antibiotic course). Rotated antibiotics were third- or fourth generation cephalosporins, piperacillin-tazobactam and carbapenems. For this analysis 1,613 admissions were eligible (855 and 758 during cycling and mixing, respectively), with 16,437 microbiological cultures obtained. Incidences of acquisition with ARB during ICU-stay were 7.3% (n = 62) and 5.1% (n = 39) during cycling and mixing, respectively (p-value 0.13), after a mean of 17.7 (median 15) and 20.8 (median 13) days. Adjusted odds ratio for acquisition of ARB carriage during mixing was 0.62 (95% CI 0.38 to 1.00). Acquired carriage with ARB were Enterobacterales species (n = 61), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 38) and Acinetobacter species (n = 20), with no statistically significant differences between interventions. There was no statistically significant difference in individual patients' risk of acquiring carriage with Gram-negative ARB during cycling and mixing. These findings substantiate the absence of difference between cycling and mixing on the epidemiology of Gram-negative ARB in ICU. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, registered 10 January 2011, NCT01293071.
Medical subject headings
- Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
- Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists/pharmacology
- Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
- Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/pharmacology
- Anti-Bacterial Agents
- Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology
- Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
- Carbapenems
- Carbapenems/pharmacology
- Cephalosporins
- Cephalosporins/pharmacology
- Cross-Over Studies
- Gram-Negative Bacteria
- Humans
- Intensive Care Units
- Piperacillin
- Piperacillin/pharmacology
- Prospective Studies
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa
- Tazobactam
- Tazobactam/pharmacology