Pain pupillary index to prognosticate unfavorable outcome in comatose cardiac arrest patients.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35504344.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2022.04.026.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
The prognostic role of the Pupillary Pain Index (PPI), derived from automated pupillometry, remains unknown in post-anoxic brain injury. Single-center retrospective study in adult comatose cardiac arrest (CA) patients. Quantitative PPI and Neurologic Pupil Index (NPi) were concomitantly recorded on day 1 and day 2 after CA. The primary outcome was to assess the prognostic value of PPI to predict 3-month unfavourable outcome (UO, defined as Cerebral Performance Category of 3-5). Secondary outcome was the agreement between PPI and NPi to predict unfavourable outcome. A total of 102 patients were included; patients with UO (n = 69, 68%) showed a lower NPi (4.2 [3.5-4.5] vs. 4.6 [4.3-4.7]; p < 0.01 on day 1-4.3 [3.8-4.7] vs 4.6 [4.3-4.8] on day 2), and PPI (3 [1-6] vs. 6 [3-7]; p < 0.01 on day 1-3 [1-6] vs 6 [4-8]; p < 0.01 on day 2) than others. A PPI = 1 on day 2 showed a sensitivity of 26 [95% CI 16-38]% and a specificity of 100 [95% CI 89-100]% to predict UO (p = 0.003 vs. NPi ≤ 2). On day 2, a total of 6 patients had concomitant PPI = 1 and NPi ≤ 2, while 12 showed NPi > 2 and PPI = 1; the coefficient of agreement was 0.42. Moreover, NPi and PPI values showed a moderate correlation both on day 1 and day 2. In this study, PPI = 1 on day 2 could predict UO in comatose CA patients with 100% specificity, but with a low sensitivity (yet higher than NPi). The agreement between PPI and NPi values was moderate.
Medical subject headings
- Coma
- Heart Arrest