Interventions in Acute Intracranial Surgery: An Evidence-Based Perspective.
review · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35505564.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.049.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
From a pathophysiological point of view, early neurosurgical treatment seems essential to prevent secondary brain injury and has been stated as the "time-is-brain" concept. However, the question immediately rises: "Is there an optimal time window for acute intracranial neurosurgical interventions?" In neurosurgery, treatment modality has been studied far more extensively than timing to surgery ("time-to-surgery"). The majority of acute intracranial neurosurgical interventions are carried out for traumatic brain injury and hemorrhagic or ischemic stroke. Current guidelines for traumatic brain injury, spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage, and middle cerebral artery infarction are reviewed and lessons learned from the randomized controlled trials mentioned are discussed. In acute intracranial neurosurgical interventions, "delayed consent" procedures could play an important role for this field of research. Whether there is an optimal time window for acute intracranial neurosurgical interventions seems difficult to be answered with randomized controlled trials referred to in the current guidelines. Observational designs, such as comparative effectiveness research, and special statistical techniques, may provide a better understanding in the optimal "time-to-surgery."
Medical subject headings
- Brain Injuries
- Brain Injuries, Traumatic
- Subarachnoid Hemorrhage