CHANDELIER-ASSISTED VERSUS STANDARD SCLERAL BUCKLING FOR PRIMARY RHEGMATOGENOUS RETINAL DETACHMENT: A Randomized Clinical Study.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35507948.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003519.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
To compare anatomical outcomes, functional outcomes, and rate of complications of standard scleral buckling (SSB) versus chandelier-assisted scleral buckling (CSB) in phakic eyes with rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Patients were randomly assigned to either SSB or CSB. Surgical success/failure rate, corrected distance visual acuity, surgical operating time, and rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications including epiretinal membranes by spectral domain optical coherence tomography were compared between groups. A total of 50 eyes of 49 patients were included. At 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference between groups in primary success, or final anatomical success ( P > 0.9); mean corrected distance visual acuity at any visit ( P values >0.05); or mean surgical time: 120.3 ± 39.05 and 102.48 ± 43.76 minutes for the SSB and CSB, respectively ( P = 0.1). The CSB had a higher rate of postoperative complications (34.8%) compared with the SSB (3.8%) ( P < 0.05). On spectral domain optical coherence tomography, CSB had a statistically significant higher rate of epiretinal membranes compared with SSB (44% vs. 19% [ P < 0.05]) and showed vitreous entrapment in the chandelier sclerotomy site on the ultrasonic biomicroscopy. Chandelier-assisted scleral buckling surgery does not offer encouraging advantages over SSB. On the contrary, we detected a higher rate of complications with CSB especially epiretinal membranes development.
Medical subject headings
- Epiretinal Membrane
- Retinal Detachment