Response to Comment on "Cryoforged nanotwinned titanium with ultrahigh strength and ductility".
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35549435.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1126/science.abo5247.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
We address the three main points of Guo <i>et al</i>. They claim that we should have used the engineering stress versus engineering strain curves to infer the mechanical properties of our nanotwinned titanium, question our sample design on the basis of a finite-element analysis, and doubt the immobility of some preexisting grain/twin boundaries in our electron backscatter diffraction micrographs. We find their analysis to be groundless and to contain many inconsistencies.