Radiation Therapy Dose Escalation in Unresectable Ewing Sarcoma: Final Results of a Phase 3 Randomized Controlled Trial.
rct · Level II
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35568246.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.04.024.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Our aim was to assess the effect of radiation therapy (RT) dose escalation on outcomes in surgically unresectable Ewing sarcoma (ES)/primitive neuroectodermal tumor (PNET). Patients with nonmetastatic unresectable ES/PNET (excluding intracranial/chest wall) receiving vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide, and etoposide chemotherapy, planned for definitive RT, were accrued in this single-institution, open-label, phase 3 randomized controlled trial. Randomization was between standard dose RT (SDRT; 55.8 Gy/31 fractions/5 days a week) versus escalated dose RT (EDRT; 70.2 Gy/39 fractions/5 days a week) with a primary objective of improving local control (LC) by 17% (65%-82%). Secondary outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and functional outcomes by Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score. Between April 2005 and December 2015, 95 patients (SDRT 47 and EDRT 48) with a median age of 17 years (interquartile range, 13-23 years) were accrued. The majority of patients were male (59%). Pelvis was the most common site of primary disease (n = 60; 63%). The median largest tumor dimension (9.7 cm) and the median maximum standardized uptake value (8.2) on pretreatment fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography were similar. At a median follow-up of 67 months, the 5-year LC, DFS, and OS for the entire cohort was 62.4%, 41.3%, and 51.9%, respectively. The 5-year LC was significantly better in EDRT compared with SDRT (76.4% vs 49.4%; P = .02). The differences in DFS and OS at 5 years (for EDRT vs SDRT) did not achieve statistical significance (DFS 46.7% vs 31.8%; P = .22 and OS 58.8% vs 45.4%; P = .08). There was a higher incidence of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade >2 skin toxic effects (acute) in the EDRT arm (10.4% vs 2.1%; P = .08) with excellent functional outcomes (median Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score = 29) in both arms. EDRT results in improved LC with good functional outcomes without a significant increase in toxic effects. Radiation dose escalation should be considered for surgically unresectable nonmetastatic ES/PNET.
Medical subject headings
- Neuroectodermal Tumors, Primitive
- Sarcoma, Ewing