Correction of a Complex Foot Deformity With V and Y Osteotomy and Ilizarov Method.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35599074.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1053/j.jfas.2022.02.005.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Many authors consider the Ilizarov method as the best choice for correction of complex multiplanar foot deformities. Fifty-one patients, for a total of 55 feet, underwent V or Y osteotomy (respectively 32 and 23), 12 were due to congenital clubfoot outcomes, 11 were from post-traumatic pathologies, 9 from hemimelia, 7 from Charcot-Marie-Tooth, 5 from poliomyelitis, 3 from spina bifida, 2 from myopathy, 2 from poly-epiphyseal dysplasia, 1 from achondroplasia, 1 from arthrogryposis, 1 patient from Charcot's foot and 1 rheumatoid arthritis. All patients were contacted to undergo AOFAS and EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The mean distraction time was 74.0 days (±25.3) and it was longer for V osteotomy (63.1 ± 21.1 vs 81.8 ± 25.4 days for Y and V respectively, p = .006). The average fixation time was 97.9 days (± 61.2), 90 days in the Y and 103 days in the V osteotomy groups. The mean preoperative foot length was longer in the group of Y osteotomy patients (158.7 ± 21.3 mm vs 133.5 ± 21.6 mm, p < .001). The mean length postoperatively was substantially the same (Y group 164.0 mm vs V group 167.4 mm, p < .562). The V osteotomy produces an elongation ratio of 440% with respect to that produced from the Y osteotomy (ratio length/distraction V/Y 0.44/0.1), with only 19% more in the distraction days. (81.8 V group vs 63.1 Y group). While the V osteotomy allows a lengthening of about 27%, the Y osteotomy, despite having correction potential superimposable to the V osteotomy, minimizes the elongation component.
Anatomy
- foot