End-Tidal to Arterial Pco₂ Ratio as Guide to Weaning from Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation.

Abstract

<b>Rationale:</b> Weaning from venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is based on oxygenation and not on carbon dioxide elimination. <b>Objectives:</b> To predict readiness to wean from VV-ECMO. <b>Methods:</b> In this multicenter study of mechanically ventilated adults with severe acute respiratory distress syndrome receiving VV-ECMO, we investigated a variable based on CO₂ elimination. The study included a prospective interventional study of a physiological cohort (<i>n</i> = 26) and a retrospective clinical cohort (<i>n</i> = 638). <b>Measurements and Main Results:</b> Weaning failure in the clinical and physiological cohorts were 37% and 42%, respectively. The main cause of failure in the physiological cohort was high inspiratory effort or respiratory rate. All patients exhaled similar amounts of CO₂, but in patients who failed the weaning trial, [Formula: see text]e was higher to maintain the Pa_CO₂ unchanged. The effort to eliminate one unit-volume of CO₂, was double in patients who failed (68.9 [42.4-123] vs. 39 [20.1-57] cm H₂O/[L/min]; <i>P</i> = 0.007), owing to the higher physiological Vd (68 [58.73] % vs. 54 [41.64] %; <i>P</i> = 0.012). End-tidal partial carbon dioxide pressure (Pet_CO₂)/Pa_CO₂ ratio was a clinical variable strongly associated with weaning outcome at baseline, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.71-1). Similarly, the Pet_CO₂/Pa_CO₂ ratio was associated with weaning outcome in the clinical cohort both before the weaning trial (odds ratio, 4.14; 95% CI, 1.32-12.2; <i>P</i> = 0.015) and at a sweep gas flow of zero (odds ratio, 13.1; 95% CI, 4-44.4; <i>P</i> < 0.001). <b>Conclusions:</b> The primary reason for weaning failure from VV-ECMO is high effort to eliminate CO₂. A higher Pet_CO₂/Pa_CO₂ ratio was associated with greater likelihood of weaning from VV-ECMO.