Baseline platelet count in percutaneous coronary intervention: a dose-response meta-analysis.

Galimzhanov, Akhmetzhan; Sabitov, Yersyn; Tenekecioglu, Erhan; Tun, Han Naung; Alasnag, Mirvat; Mamas, Mamas A · Heart · 2022

meta_analysis · Level I

Where this comes from

Abstract

The nature of the relationship between baseline platelet count and clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear. We undertook dose-response and pairwise meta-analyses to better describe the prognostic value of the initial platelet count and clinical endpoints in patients after PCI. A search of PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science (up to 9 October 2021) was performed to identify studies that evaluated the association between platelet count and clinical outcomes following PCI. The primary outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major bleeding. We performed random-effects pairwise and one-stage dose-response meta-analyses by calculating HRs and 95% CIs. The meta-analysis included 19 studies with 217 459 patients. We report a J-shaped relationship between baseline thrombocyte counts and all-cause death, MACE and major bleeding at follow-up. The risk of haemorrhagic events exceeded the risk of thrombotic events at low platelet counts (<175×10<sup>9</sup>/L), while a predominant ischaemic risk was observed at high platelet counts (>250×10<sup>9</sup>/L). Pairwise meta-analyses revealed a robust link between initial platelet counts and the risk of postdischarge all-cause mortality, major bleeding (for thrombocytopenia: HR 1.39, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.49; HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.00, respectively) and future death from any cause and MACE (thrombocytosis: HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.29 to 1.98; HR 1.47, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.78, respectively). Low platelet counts were associated with the predominant bleeding risk, while high platelet counts were only associated with the ischaemic events. CRD42021283270.