Automated segmentation of the healed anterior cruciate ligament from T<sub>2</sub> * relaxometry MRI scans.
basic_science · Level V
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35634860.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1002/jor.25390 and PMC identifier 9708947.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
Collagen organization of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) can be evaluated using T<sub>2</sub> * relaxometry. However, T<sub>2</sub> * mapping requires manual image segmentation, which is a time-consuming process and prone to inter- and intra- segmenter variability. Automating segmentation would address these challenges. A model previously trained using Constructive Interference in Steady State (CISS) scans was applied to T<sub>2</sub> * segmentation via transfer learning. It was hypothesized that there would be no significant differences in the model's segmentation performance between T<sub>2</sub> * and CISS, structural measures versus ground truth manual segmentation, and reliability versus independent and retest manual segmentation. Transfer learning was conducted using 54 T<sub>2</sub> * scans of the ACL. Segmentation performance was assessed with Dice coefficient, precision, and sensitivity, and structurally with T<sub>2</sub> * value, volume, subvolume proportions, and cross-sectional area. Model performance relative to independent manual segmentation and repeated segmentation by the ground truth segmenter (retest) were evaluated on a random subset. Segmentation performance was analyzed with Mann-Whitney U tests, structural measures with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and performance relative to manual segmentation with repeated-measures analysis of variance/Tukey tests (α = 0.05). T<sub>2</sub> * segmentation performance was not significantly different from CISS on all measures (p > 0.35). No significant differences were detected in structural measures (p > 0.50). Automatic segmentation performed as well as the retest on all segmentation measures, whereas independent segmentations were lower than retest and/or automatic segmentation (p < 0.023). Structural measures were not significantly different between segmenters. The automatic segmentation model performed as well on the T<sub>2</sub> * sequence as on CISS and outperformed independent manual segmentation while performing as well as retest segmentation.
Medical subject headings
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging