Subsequent treatments beyond progression on osimertinib in EGFR-mutated NSCLC and leptomeningeal metastases.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35644609.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1186/s12916-022-02387-0 and PMC identifier 9150343.
- Licence recorded as CC BY.
- The licence permits redistribution, so the abstract is shown in full and the full text is available from the publisher.
Abstract
Despite the reported efficacy of osimertinib, central nervous system (CNS) progression is still frequent in EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This study aimed to reveal site-specific resistant mechanisms to osimertinib and investigate subsequent treatments for leptomeningeal metastases (LM). EGFR-mutated NSCLC with LM who progressed on osimertinib were included. Molecular analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at osimertinib progression was performed. Subsequent treatments of LM were collected and analyzed. A total of 246 patients were identified. Only those with LM as a progression site on osimertinib were included (n=81). In 58 CSF-plasma pairs, more alterations were uniquely detected in CSF (77%) than in plasma (7%). These mechanisms led to 22 patients receiving matched targeted therapy. Among them, 16 (72.7%) had a clinical response. The median overall survival was 7.2 months. For non-matched therapy (n=59), the osimertinib combination had a longer median overall survival than the regimen switch in CNS-only progression (15.3 vs. 7 months, p=0.03). Finally, serial monitoring by CSF revealed the potential evolution of LM. Private resistant mechanisms in CSF might match osimertinib-resistant LM for targeted therapy. Besides, continuing osimertinib with intensification strategy might prolong survival, especially for those with CNS-only progression. Prospective exploration is needed.
Medical subject headings
- Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung
- Lung Neoplasms