Automated patient self-scheduling: case study.
retrospective_cohort · Level III
Where this comes from
- Record sourced from PubMed, PMID 35652165.
- Also identified by DOI 10.1093/jamia/ocac087 and PMC identifier 9382371.
- No licence information is recorded for this record.
- Because redistribution is not established, this page shows the abstract only. Follow the links below for the full text.
Abstract
This case study assesses the uptake, user characteristics, and outcomes of automated self-scheduling in a community-based physician group affiliated with an academic health system. We analyzed 1 995 909 appointments booked between January 1, 2019, and June 30, 2021 at more than 30 practice sites. Over the study period, uptake of self-scheduling increased from 4% to 15% of kept appointments. Younger, commercially insured patients were more likely to be users. Missed appointments were lower and cancelations were higher for self-scheduled patients. An examination of characteristics, benefits, and usage of automated self-scheduling provides insight to those organizations contemplating the implementation or expansion of similar consumer-facing digital self-scheduling platforms.
Medical subject headings
- Appointments and Schedules